I think it’s fair to say a large collective of governmental institutions are either completely insane or acting purposefully in a deceptive way towards the people they supposedly represent democratically. Some examples of recent insane behaviours include:
- France president Macron saying he wants to ‘piss of the unvaccinated’. He plans to not allow negative tests to prove you are safe to mix in society. But why? This is a country, which like most European countries (UK, Italy, Spain etc) that have had hundreds of thousands Covid infections daily. The country has a very high vaccination rate, therefore, conclusively proves the vaccine does nothing (or almost nothing) to prevent infections. The logic is utterly flawed. Clearly, there is an ulterior motive.
- Australia’s Novak Saga is utterly ridiculous. Whatever the outcome on his deportation case, it shows the federal government is insane.
- Italy following in France’s footsteps.
- Germany consider compulsory vaccine mandates.
- Austria enacting compulsory vaccine mandates.
- UK considering passing NHS compulsory vaccine mandates for most staff. Sajid Javid challenged by a top Cambridge educated consultant on the merits, where he states ‘the science’ is not strong enough to support mandates. Note, he is not Anti-vaccine in any way, and yet that is how the media portray him. Personally, I think it is a convenient way to reduce the NHS staff by 10% and cut the payroll, forcing the public to ‘go private’.
- The media generally is totally one-sided and unbalanced in supporting vaccine mandates. Only recently have sky news begun taking a more balanced approach. This is good news. Many articles written by the BBC for example, in particular Rachel Schraer (their Senior reporter for BBC News, covering health and misinformation. Nuance Correspondent) are an utter joke. Her articles have been previous discredited by other doctors, such as Dr John Campbell. Here is an example of her Ivermectin ‘debunking’ article – which you can view here.
- Additionally, a general note to the public; be aware of sites that use the words ‘fact-checking’, ‘mis-information’, as well as social media platforms that partake in censoring of medical professionals (or any scientist) for expressing opinions that may differ that those generally accepted. There are many such persons that have lost their jobs, and been silenced, just for standing up for what they believe to be true and accurate. Even if someone is wrong, the approach taken to shutdown these individuals is completely unnecessary. The truth does not need to fear opinions that are false, or can be proven to be false. Such behaviours only go to show or indicate there is a general suppression or effort to hide the truth.
- Science needs freedom of expression and people to challenge the status quo and those things that are accepted as fact. That is how it works. Evidence is presented, evaluated and proven to be true or false. Freedom of expression and thought are absolutely critical. Censorship has no place in society and is a very, very slippery path to the end of free democratic societies.